Table 9 Binary logistic regression: Interplay between social identifications, country contexts and local voting probability

 Turkish identification

.25 (.25)

.19 (.11)†

 Islamic identification

−.01 (.07)

−.05 (.02)*

 Group discrimination of Turkish-origin individuals

.08 (.09)

.06 (.07)

 Group discrimination of Muslims

−.08 (.07)

−.09 (.08)

 Personal experiences of discrimination

.02 (.07)

.04 (.06)

 Age

.07 (.02)***

.08 (.02)***

 Women (ref. men)

.04 (.12)

−.02 (.12)

 Middle education (ref. lower)

−.33 (.42)

−.16 (.49)

 Higher education (ref. lower)

.24 (.51)

.37 (.65)

 Hours worked per week

.00 (.01)

.01 (.01)

 Monthly income

−.05 (.05)

−.07 (.06)

 Language proficiency

.12 (.03)***

.11 (.04)**

 National identification

.26 (.11)*

.21 (.10)*

 National-origin composition neighborhood

−.03 (.07)

−.02 (.07)

 Turkish best friend (ref. native best friend)

−.57 (.20)**

−.37 (.20)†

 Other origin best friend (ref. native best friend)

−.14 (.22)

.16 (.20)

  Shia

.72 (.46)

.76 (.45)†

  Alevi

.32 (.29)

.43 (.29)

  Other Muslims

−.11 (.11)

−.11 (.11)

  Non-believer

.16 (.17)

 France

.22 (1.50)

−.05 (.64)

 Germany

.95 (1.36)

−1.18 (.39)**

 Switzerland

.65 (1.20)

−.12 (.91)

 The Netherlands

.99 (1.21)

−.35 (.43)

 France * Turkish identification

−.06 (.29)

 Germany * Turkish identification

−.36 (.25)

 Switzerland * Turkish identification

−.17 (.25)

 The Netherlands * Turkish identification

−.03 (.23)

 France * Islamic identification

.05 (.10)

 Germany * Islamic identification

.15 (.04)***

 Switzerland * Islamic identification

.07 (.13)

 The Netherlands * Islamic identification

.31 (.11)**

N

1627

1229

Df

33

31

Prob>Chi2

.000

.000