Table 5 Logistic regression analysis, by distance from a refugee camp (odds ratios)
From: How do refugees affect social life in host communities? The case of Congolese refugees in Rwanda
Feel safe in the community | Formal network | Informal network | Trust in people from own community | Trust in IOs and NGOs | Trust in refugees in Rwanda | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
Camp proximity <10 km | 0.98 | 0.80 | 1.41** | 0.64** | 0.97 | 1.33 |
(0.22) | (0.12) | (0.22) | (0.13) | (0.26) | (0.26) | |
Gihembe | 2.27*** | 0.89 | 0.54*** | 1.35 | 2.24** | 0.77 |
(0.62) | (0.16) | (0.10) | (0.32) | (0.78) | (0.18) | |
Kigeme | 1.72* | 1.34 | 0.69* | 1.32 | 0.93 | 0.59** |
(0.48) | (0.27) | (0.14) | (0.34) | (0.29) | (0.14) | |
Female | 0.72 | 0.89 | 1.13 | 0.65* | 1.82** | 0.79 |
(0.18) | (0.14) | (0.19) | (0.14) | (0.51) | (0.16) | |
Age | 1.01 | 1.01* | 1.00 | 1.02** | 1.01 | 1.00 |
(0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.01) | |
Married | 0.73 | 0.79 | 1.14 | 0.93 | 0.83 | 0.76 |
(0.22) | (0.15) | (0.22) | (0.23) | (0.29) | (0.19) | |
Literate | 1.08 | 1.74*** | 1.74*** | 0.77 | 1.06 | 0.60** |
(0.29) | (0.31) | (0.32) | (0.19) | (0.32) | (0.14) | |
At least one employed member | 2.38** | 2.21*** | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.43 | 0.94 |
(0.89) | (0.68) | (0.23) | (0.30) | (0.30) | (0.36) | |
Monthly household income (RWF) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00*** | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
(0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.00) | |
Share of children (per adults) | 1.17 | 1.07 | 1.28** | 1.04 | 0.98 | 0.92 |
(0.20) | (0.11) | (0.13) | (0.16) | (0.16) | (0.11) | |
Household size | 0.98 | 1.08 | 0.95 | 1.10 | 1.09 | 0.98 |
(0.06) | (0.05) | (0.04) | (0.07) | (0.09) | (0.05) | |
Pseudo-R2 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
N | 740 | 740 | 740 | 740 | 740 | 740 |