Editorial
Who needs integration? Debating a central, yet increasingly contested concept in migration studies
Integration is a pivotal concept in migration studies. Yet, over time critiques have been formulated that question the very assumptions that the concept of integration rests on. Willem Schinkel, one of the major criticasters explains what is wrong with the concept. Is it that bad? ...
Sawitri Saharso
Comparative Migration Studies 2019 7:16
Published: 1 May 2019
Original Article
Against 'immigration integration': for an end to neocolonial knowledge production
This paper, written on invitation by the editors of Comparative Migration Studies, is intended as a provocation piece for invited commentators, and more broadly for those working with, or concerned about, the ...
Willem Schinkel
Comparative Migration Studies 2018 6:31
Published: 25 September 2018
Commentary
Integration: twelve propositions after Schinkelāāāāāāā
By way of a commentary on Willem Schinkelās āAgainst āimmigrant integrationā: For an end to neocolonial knowledge productionā in this volume, I propose twelve propositions in order to rethink the academic use of the concept āintegrationā in contemporary migration studies.
Adrian Favell
Comparative Migration Studies 2018 7:21
Published: 16 May 2019
Commentary
Immigrant integration: the governance of ethno-cultural differencesāāāāāāā
This commentary is a reply to the article āAgainst immigrant integrationā by Willem Schinkel. It argues that rather than abandoning immigrant integration as a field of research, we have to continue to strengthen critical approaches. Immigrant integration has to be understood and analyzed as a governance technique...
Leila Hadj Abdou
Comparative Migration Studies 2019 7:15
Published: 30 April 2019
Commentary
Of straw figures and multi-stakeholder monitoring ā a response to Willem Schinkelāāāāāāā
This article is a response to Willem Schinkelās provocation piece. While mostly agreeing with Schinkel, my response questions Schinkelās commitment to losing immigrant integration as an object of analysis. I point to the integrationist logic with which Schinkel assaults superdiversity, to more broadly question how prescriptive a social science that is āagainst immigrant integrationā should be.
Fran Meissnerāāāāāāā
Comparative Migration Studies 2019 7:18
Published: 13 May 2019
Commentary
Relational integration: a response to Willem Schinkelāāāāāāā
In this essay, I respond to Schinkelās recent statement that āany claim and practice that concerns āintegrationā should be the object of research, rather than the project of researchā (2018, p. 8). Although I agree with Schinkel that there are problematic practices of integration research, I do not agree that integration cannot be used as an analytical concept ...
Lea M. Klarenbeekāāāāāāā
Comparative Migration Studies 2019 7:20
Published: 15 May 2019
Commentary
Problems of and solutions for the study of immigrant integrationāāāāāāā
In his contribution, Willem Schinkel makes critical observations on the concept of immigrant integration and its use in Europe, specifically in the Netherlands. Three of these are agreeable: there is a lot of fuzziness around the concept...
Rinus Penninx
Comparative Migration Studies 2019 7:13
Published: 16 April 2019
Commentary
Migration studies: an impositionāāāāāāā
This is a rejoinder to the responses made to my paper āAgainst āimmigrant integrationā: For an end to neocolonial knowledge productionā, which was based on my book Imagined Societies. A Critique of Immigrant Integration in Western Europe (Cambridge University Press, 2017). Here, I aim to push the boundaries...
Willem Schinkel
Comparative Migration Studies 2019 7:32
Published: 01 August 2019