Skip to main content

Table 2 Odds Ratios from Double Cohort Logistic Regressions Predicting Remittance-sending (N = 1,244)

From: Toward an improved understanding of immigrant adaptation and transnational engagement: the case of Cuban Émigrés in the United States

 

M1

M2

M3

M4

M5

Historical Cohort :

     

Late Exiles

1.70***

1.28

1.30

1.39

2.65*

Mariels

2.04***

1.55*

1.60*

1.81*

2.83*

New Cubans

5.01***

3.39***

3.53***

3.61***

13.86***

Transnationalism predictors:

     

Relatives in Cuba

 

4.44***

4.50***

4.55***

4.68***

Household income

     

20 k-50 k

 

1.24

1.25

1.25

1.25

50 k+

 

1.28

1.26

1.25

1.36

Income missing

 

0.81

0.81

0.81

0.83

Assimilation Predictors:

     

News language preference

     

English

  

1.28

1.28

1.50

Bilingual or Other

  

0.95

0.95

0.99

Temporal Duration (κπ):

     

Late Exiles 7 years later

   

0.87

0.83

Mariels 7 years later

   

0.80

0.77

New Cubans 7 years later

   

0.95

0.93

Age-at-Migration (ηπ):

     

Late Exiles

     

30-39 (37–36 in 2007)

    

0.10**

50-59 (57–66 in 2007)

    

0.63

60-69 (67–76 in 2007)

    

0.58

70-79 (77–86 in 2007)

    

0.42

Mariels

     

30-39 (37–36 in 2007)

    

0.22

50-59 (57–66 in 2007)

    

0.98

60-69 (67–76 in 2007)

    

0.38

70-79 (77–86 in 2007)

    

0.76

New Cubans

     

30-39 (37–36 in 2007)

    

0.08**

50-59 (57–66 in 2007)

    

0.43

60-69 (67–76 in 2007)

    

0.17*

70-79 (77–86 in 2007)

    

0.07**

Constant

0.49***

0.15***

0.14***

0.13***

0.07**

Log likelihood

−768.50

−723.58

−722.75

−722.55

−710.55

Psuedo R2

0.10

0.15

0.15

0.15

0.17

  1. FIU Cuba Poll, 2000 and 2007
  2. All models control for survey year (period), birth cohort (age), marital status, and gender
  3. *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001