Skip to main content

Table 2 Effects on local voting likelihood

From: The relationship between social identification and local voting, and its interplay with personal and group discrimination among the descendants of Turkish immigrants in Western Europe

 

Model 1

Model 2

Social Identification

 Turkish identification

.09 (.09)

.20 (.11)†

 Islamic identification

.02 (.06)

.04 (.08)

Perceived Discrimination

 Group discrimination of Turkish-origin individuals

.07 (.09)

.06 (.07)

 Group discrimination of Muslims

−.08 (.08)

−.09 (.08)

 Personal experiences of discrimination

−.02 (.07)

.04 (.06)

Control variables

 Age

.07 (.02)***

.08 (.02)***

 Women (ref. men)

.05 (.12)

−.02 (.12)

 Middle education (ref. lower)

−.30 (.40)

−.19 (.47)

 Higher education (ref. lower)

.24 (.51)

.33 (.63)

 Hours worked per week

.00 (.01)

.01 (.01)

 Monthly income

−.04 (.06)

−.08 (.06)

 Language proficiency

.12 (.03)***

.11 (.04)**

 National identification

.25 (.11)*

.21 (.10)*

 National-origin composition neighborhood

−.04 (.07)

−.02 (.07)

 Turkish best friend (ref. native best friend)

−.58 (.19)**

−.36 (.21)†

 Other origin best friend (ref. native best friend)

−.17 (.21)

.13 (.21)

 Islamic denomination (ref. Sunni)

 Shia

.57 (.38)

.74 (.43)†

 Alevi

.38 (.28)

.45 (.29)

 Other Muslims

−.10 (.10)

−.10 (.10)

 Non-believer

.22 (.17)

–

Countries (ref. Austria)

 France

.00 (.33)

.14 (.27)

 Germany

−.36 (.41)

−.56 (.35)

 Switzerland

−.01 (.49)

.19 (.44)

 The Netherlands

.91 (.34)**

.94 (.30)**

N

1627

1229

Df

29

28

Prob>Chi2

.000

.000

  1. The results are reported in log odds, the standard errors are indicated in parentheses and the standard errors are clustered on cities
  2. Source: TIES survey 2007/2008; † p < 0.10 *p < 0.05 **p < 0.01 ***p < 0.001