Skip to main content

Table 2 Implementation approaches according to policies and employed logics, by level of restrictiveness re: 'tolerated' persons

From: Ambiguous goals, uneven implementation – how immigration offices shape internal immigration control in Germany

District / city

Implementation approaches

Employed logics

Self-description

Re: asylum seekers

Re: ‘tolerated’ persons

D6

expansive

expansive

expansive

econ

D9

expansive

expansive

expansive

econ

D10

_

expansive

intermediate

econ

D1

_

_

intermediate

reg

D4

_

expansive

intermediate

econ / reg

D5

_

expansive

intermediate

econ / reg

D7

restrictive / expansive

expansive

intermediate-restrictive

econ / reg

D2

restrictive

expansive

intermediate-restrictive

econ / reg

D11

expansive

intermediate-restrictive

intermediate-restrictive

econ

D3

restrictive

expansive

restrictive

reg

D8

_

intermediate

restrictive

reg

  1. Note: Interviewees were asked about their self-description indirectly, i.e. how they evaluate the practices of their office in comparison with others. If interviewees remarked about their practices as relatively ‘restrictive’ or ‘expansive’ on other occasions during the interview, this was coded as well. About half of interviewees did not disclose a self-description