Skip to main content
Comparative Migration Studies
Download PDF

The Effects of Islam, Religiosity, and Socialization on Muslim-Canadian Opinions about Same-Sex Marriage

Comparative Migration Studies volume 1, pages 147–178 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

Critics of Islam often frame anti-Islamic positions as a defense of tolerance against intolerance, and of equality against inequality. Islam, for this perspective, poses challenges for the ideological integration of Muslim immigrants in Western societies. This paper examines Canadian Muslims’ opinions about same-sex marriage. The analysis suggests that Canadian Muslims, as a group, do have distinctively negative opinions about same-sex marriage, but that there is substantial and systematic variation in opinions about this issue within the Muslim-Canadian community. Indeed, it is religiosity in general, rather than Islam in particular, that generates negative opinions about gay marriage. Exposure to the Canadian context, and especially postsecondary education, largely undoes the distinctiveness of Canadian Muslims’ opinions about this issue.

References

  1. Abramson, P. and Inglehart, R. (1994). Education, security, and postmaterialism: A comment on Dutch and Taylor’s postmaterialism and the economic condition. American Journal of Political Science, 38(3):797–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adamczyk, A. and Pitt, C. (2009). Shaping attitudes about homosexuality: The role of religion and cultural context. Social Science Research, 38(2):338–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adida, C., Laitin, D. D., and Valfort, M.-A. (2010). Identifying barriers to Muslim integration in France. Proceedings of the National Academic of Sciences, 107(52):384–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Akkerman, T. (2005). Anti-immigration parties and the Defence of liberal values: The exceptional case of the List Pim Fortuyn. Journal of Political Ideologies, 10(3):337–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Akkerman, T. (2010). Women and children first! Anti-immigration parties and gender in Norway and the Netherlands. Patterns of Prejudice, 41(2):197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Betz, H.-G. and Meret, S. (2009). Revisiting Lepanto: The political mobilization against Islam in contemporary Western Europe. Patterns of Prejudice, 43(3):313–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bevelander, P. and Otterbeck, J. (2010). Young people’s attitudes towards Muslims in Sweden. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(3):404–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bleich, E. (2003). Race Politics in Britain and France: Ideas and Policymaking since the 1960s. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Bleich, E. (2009). Where do Muslims stand on ethno-racial hierarchies in Britain and France? Evidence from public opinion surveys, 1988–2008. Patterns of Prejudice, 43(3):379–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boswell, J. (1980). Christianity, Social Tolerance and Homosexuality: Gay People in Western Europe from the Beginning of the Christian Era to the Fourteenth Century. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bouchard, G. and Taylor, C. (2008). Building the Future: A Time for Reconciliation. Report of the Commission de Consultation sur les Pratiques D’Accommodement Reliees aux Differencs Culturelles. Quebec, PQ: Government of Quebec.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chang, L. and Krosnick, J. A. (2009). National surveys via rdd telephone interviewing versus the internet: Comparing sample representativeness and response quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(4):641–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chui, T., Tran, K., and Maheux, H. (2007). Immigration in Canada: A portrait of the foreign-born population, 2006 census. Statistics Canada, Catalogue no.97-557:1–37.

  14. Connor, P. (2010). Contexts of immigrant receptivity and immigrant religious outcomes: the case of Muslims in Western Europe. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(3):376–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dutch, R. and Taylor, M. (1993). Postmaterialism and the economic condition. American Journal of Political Science, 37(3):747–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ehrkamp, P. (2010). The limits of multicultural tolerance? Liberal democracy and media portrayals of Muslim migrant women in Germany. Space & Polity, 14(1):13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Eliadis, P. (2007). Belonging? Diversity Recognition and Shared Citizenship in Canada, chapter Diversity and Equality: The Vital Connection, pages 547–559. Montreal, PQ: The Institute for Research on Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  18. European Values Study Group and World Values Survey Association (2010). European and world values survey — microdata [computer file]. Madrid, Spain and Tilburg University, Tilberg, the Netherlands: ASEP/JDS [producer]. Cologne, Germany: ASEP/JDS and GESIS [distributor].

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fassin, E. (2010). National identities and transnational intimacies: Sexual democracy and the politics of immigration in Europe. Political Culture, 22(3):507–529.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fekete, L. (2008). Integration, Islamophobia and Civil Rights in Europe. London, UK: Institute of Race Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fetzer, J. S. and Soper, C. J. (2003). The roots of public attitudes toward state accomodation of European Muslims’ religious practices before and after September 11. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42(2):247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hekma, G. (2002). Imams and homosexuality: A post-gay debate in the Netherlands. Sexualities, 5(2):237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Inglehart, R. and Norris, P. (2003). The true clash of civilizations. Foreign Policy, 135:62–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ipsos (2006). 2006 election exit poll: microdata file [computer file]. Toronto, ON: Ipsos [producer]. Laurier Institute for the Study of Public Opinion and Policy [distributor], 2010/10/01.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ipsos (2011). 2011 election exit poll: microdata file [computer file]. Toronto, ON: Ipsos [producer]. Laurier Institute for the Study of Public Opinion and Policy [distributor], 2012/07/01.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jedwab, J. (2011). Groups and intergroup relations: Canadian perceptions. Online. Accessed July 10, 2012.

  28. Jennings, M. K. and Niemi, R. G. (1981). Generations and Politics: A Panel Study of Young Adults and their Parents. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Leger Marketing Research (2011). A decade after September 11th 2001. Online. Accessed July 10, 2012.

  30. Little, R, J. A. (1992). Regression with missing X’s: A review. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(420):1227–1237.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mepschen, P., Duyvendak, J. W., and Tonkens, E. H. (2010). Sexual politics, orientalism and multicultural citizenship in the Netherlands. Sociology, 44(5):962–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Municipalité de Hérouxville (2010). Normes de vie de la Municipalité de Hérouxville. Online. Accessed July 20, 2010.

  33. Pew Research Center (2011). The future of the global Muslim population: Projections for 2010–2030. Online. Accessed February 15, 2011.

  34. Razak, S. H. (2008). Casting Out: The Eviction of Muslims from Western Law and Politics. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rimmerman, C. A., Wald, Kenneth, D., and Wilcox, C. (2000). The Politics of Gay Rights. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Scheepers, P., Gijsberts, M., and Coenders, M. (2002). Ethnic exclusionism in European countries: Public opposition to civil rights for legal migrants as a response to perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review, 18(1):17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Scott, J. W. (2009). Sexularism. Ursula Hirschmann Annual Lecture on Gender and Europe. Florence, IT: European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Semyonov, M., Raijman, R., and Gorodzeisky, A. (2006). The rise of anti-foreigner sentiment in European societies, 1988–2000. American Sociological Review, 71(3):426–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shachar, A. (2000). Should Church and State be Joined at the Altar? Women’s Rights and the Multicultural Dilemma. In W. Kymlicka, & W. Norman (Eds.) Citizenship in Diverse Societies (pp. 119–136). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shadid, W. (1991). The integration of Muslim minorities in the Netherlands. International Migration Review, 25(2):355–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sniderman, P. M., Peri, P., Figueiredo, R. J. P., and Piazza, T. (2000). The Outsider: Prejudice and Politics in Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Statistics Canada (2001). 2001 Census of Canada: public use microdatafile — individuals file [computer file]. Revision 2. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada [producer]. Data Liberation Initiative [distributor], 2006/04/26. (STC 95M0016XCB).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Strabac, Z. and Listhaug, O. (2008). Anti-Muslim prejudice in Europe: A multilevel analysis of survey data from 30 countries. Social Science Research, 37(1):268–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. United Nations Human Development Programme (2011). The Human Development Report 2011. New York, NY: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Warwick, P. (1998). Disputed cause, disputed effect: The postmaterialist thesis re-examined. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62:583–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Weil, F. D. (1985). The variable effects of education on liberal attitudes: A comparative-historical analysis of anti-Semitism using public opinion survey data. American Sociological Review. 50:458–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zolberg, A. R. and Litt Woon, L. (1999). Why Islam is like Spanish: Cultural incorporation in Europe and the United States. Politics & Society, 27(1):5–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

    Christopher Cochrane

Authors
  1. Christopher Cochrane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Cochrane.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cochrane, C. The Effects of Islam, Religiosity, and Socialization on Muslim-Canadian Opinions about Same-Sex Marriage. CMS 1, 147–178 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5117/CMS2013.1.COCH

Download citation

Keywords

  • Islam
  • Muslims
  • Immigration
  • Public Opinion
  • Same-Sex Marriage