Skip to main content
Comparative Migration Studies
Download PDF

Are unequal societies more migratory?

Comparative Migration Studies volume 1, pages 97–122 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

Are unequal societies more migratory? The position of this paper is: not necessarily, it depends on the type of inequality. By proposing horizontal and vertical inequality between and within ethnic groups as separate drivers of migration, we hypothesize that heightened emigration is a consequence of vertical inequality and feelings of individual relative deprivation, whereas people facing horizontal inequality feel rather strongly about collective relative deprivation, making non-migration more likely. Consequently, inequality and relative deprivation can work in both directions, i.e. either as a driver or a barrier of migration, depending on whether social comparisons are made within or between ethnic groups. Analysis of emigrant stocks for a large set of developed and developing countries show that countries with higher levels of horizontal inequality across ethnic groups show a lower emigration propensity whereas vertical within-group inequality seems rather a reason for people moving abroad. The analysis also shows that the relative size of these behavioural responses depends on people’s educational levels which largely reflect their exit opportunities.

References

  • Bhandari, P. (2004). Relative deprivation and migration in an agricultural setting of Nepal. Population & Environment, 25(5), 475–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G.J. (1987). Self-Selection and the Earnings of Immigrants, American Economic Review, 77(4), 531–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M.B. (1991). The social self. On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (2000). Group Processes: Dynamics Within and Between Groups. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cederman, L.-E., Weidmann, N.B., & Gleditsch, K.S. (2011). Horizontal Inequalities and Ethno-Nationalist Civil War: A Global Comparison. American Political Science Review, 105(3), 478–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cederman, L.-E., Wimmer, A., & Min, B. (2010). Why Do Ethnic Groups Rebel? New Data and Analysis. World Politics, 62(1), 87–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEPII (2012) GeoDist. Retrieved in January 2013 from http://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/en/welcome.asp

  • Czaika, M. (2012). Internal versus international migration and the role of multiple deprivation: some evidence from India, Asian Population Studies, 8(2), 125–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czaika, M., & de Haas, H. (2012). The Role of Internal and International Relative Deprivation in Global Migration. Oxford Development Studies, 40(4), 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czaika, M., & Vothknecht, M. (2012). Migration as cause and consequence of aspirations, IMI Working Paper, No. 57, University of Oxford.

  • De Haas, H. (2010). Migration and Development: A Theoretical Perspective. International Migration Review, 44(1), 227–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Docquier, F., & Marfouk, A. (2006) International Migration, Remittances and Development, In: C. Ozden and M. Schiff (eds), Palgrave Macmillan: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellemers, N., van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1990). The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29(3), 233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedomhouse. (2009). Freedom in the World. FreedomHouse: Washington, DC. Retrieved in Januray 2013 from www.freedomhouse.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibney, M., Cornett, L., & Wood, R., (2011) Political Terror Scale 1976–2008. Retrieved in January 2013 from the PTS website: www.politicalterrorscale.org/

  • Gurr, T. R. (1993). Minorities at Risk: A Global View of Ethno-political Conflicts, Washington DC: Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, D.L. (1985). Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawakami, K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). The impact of salient self-identities on relative deprivation and action intentions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23(5), 525–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebig, T., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2004). Migration, self-selection and income inequality: an international analysis, Kyklos, 57(1), 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of International Migration: A Review and Appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19(3), 431–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayda, A. (2009). International migration: a panel data analysis of the determinants of bilateral flows. Journal of Population Economics, 23(4), 1249–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, T., & Zignago, X. (2006). Notes on CEPII’s distances measures. www.cepii.fr/distance/noticedist_en.pdf.

  • McKenzie, D. & Gibson, J. (2010) The Development Impact of a Best Practice Seasonal Worker Policy, Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W.D. (2006). Geography and Macroeconomics: New Data and New Findings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(10): 3510–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1981). Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, F., & Peri, G. (2013). The Effect of Income and Immigration Policies on International Migration, Migration Studies, 1(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Østby, G. (2008). Polarization, Horizontal Inequalities and Violent Civil Conflict, Journal of Peace Research, 45(2), 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Østby, G. (2011). Horizontal Inequalities and Political Violence. PhD Dissertation, University of Oslo.

  • Pettigrew, T. F., Christ, O., Wagner, U., Meertens, R. W., Van Dick, R., & Zick, A. (2008). Relative Deprivation and Intergroup Prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 64(2), 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaff, S., & Kim, H. (2003). Exit-Voice Dynamics in Collective Action: An Analysis of Emigration and Protest in the East German Revolution. American Journal of Sociology 109(2), 401–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, M. A. (2006). Relative deprivation, wage differentials and Mexican migration. Review of Development Economics, 10(1), 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative Deprivation and Social Justice: A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1992) Inequality Re-examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O. (1984). Rural-to-Urban Migration in LDCs: A Relative Deprivation Approach. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 32(3), 475–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O. (2006). Inequality and migration: A behavioral link. Economics Letters, 91(1), 146–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O., Micevska, M., & Mycielski, J. (2009). Relative poverty as a determinant of migration: Evidence from Poland. Economics Letters, 103(3), 119–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O., & Taylor, J. E. (1989). Relative Deprivation and International Migration. Demography, 26(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O., & Taylor, J. E. (1991). Migration Incentives, Migration Types: The Role of Relative Deprivation. The Economic Journal, 101(408), 1163–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O., & Yitzhaki, S. (1988). Labour Migration as a Response to Relative Deprivation. Journal of Population Economics, 1(1), 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, F. (2002) Horizontal Inequalities: A Neglected Dimension of Development, QEH Working Paper, No. 81, University of Oxford.

  • Stewart, F., Brown, G., & Mancini, L. (2005). Why Horizontal Inequalities Matter: Some Implications for Measurement, CRISE working paper, No. 19, University of Oxford.

  • Stewart, F. (ed.)(2008). Horizontal Inequalities and Conflict: Understanding Group Violence in Multiethnic Societies. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual review of psychology, 33(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1978). From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2012) Human Development Index, United Nations: New York, retrieved in January 2013 from http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/indicators/103106.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogler, M., & Rotte, R. (2000). The effects of development on migration: theoretical issues and new empirical evidence. Journal of Population Economics, 13(3), 485–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, I., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1984). Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23(4), 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, I., & Mann, L. (1987). Unemployment, relative deprivation, and social protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13(2), 275–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, I., & Smith, H. J. (2000) Relative Deprivation: Specification, Development, and Integration, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Stephen C. (2001) “Strategic collective action: Social psychology and social change.” Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (2001): 409–430.

  • Worldbank. (2012). World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouterse, F. (2008) Migration, Poverty, and Inequality: Evidence from Burkina Faso, Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhaki, S. (1979). Relative Deprivation and the Gini Coefficient. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93(2), 321–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Migration Institute for International Development, University of Oxford, 3 Mansfield Road, OX1 3TB, Oxford, UK

    Mathias Czaika

Authors
  1. Mathias Czaika
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathias Czaika.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Czaika, M. Are unequal societies more migratory?. CMS 1, 97–122 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5117/CMS2013.1.CZAI

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.5117/CMS2013.1.CZAI

Keywords

  • international migration
  • inequality
  • relative deprivation