Skip to main content

The Making and Unmaking of Religious Boundaries

Comparing Turkish and Moroccan Muslim minorities in European Cities

Abstract

In public debates over multiculturalism in Europe, Islamic values and ways of life are commonly represented as incompatible with Western rights and liberties. Against this background, Muslim minorities have developed generally strong and stable religious identities. This paper asks when and how multicultural cities and ethnic communities give rise to strong and stable religion. Taking an approach from religious boundary making as a heuristic framework, we bring together a series of five studies on the religious identities of Muslim minorities. The studies compare religious group boundaries and replicate boundary making processes (cf. Wimmer, 2008) across ethnic communities and multicultural cities as comparative cases. Drawing on several large-scale surveys of Muslim minorities, our comparative findings illuminate the making and unmaking of religious boundaries. We conclude that strong religion is ‘made in Europe’ as institutional rigidities and social inequalities enforce religious boundary making through social closure and cultural maintenance within ethnic communities.

References

  • Alba, R. (2005). Bright vs. blurred boundaries: Second-generation assimilation and exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(1), 20–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alwall, J. (2000). Religious liberty in Sweden: an overview. Journal of Church and State, 42(1), 147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V. (2007). The governance of Islam in Europe: The perils of modelling. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(6), 871–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, F. (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries. The social organization of cultural difference. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauböck, R. (1998). The crossing and blurring of boundaries in international migration. Challenges for social and political theory. Pp. 17–52 in R. Bauböck & J. Rundell (Eds.), Blurred Boundaries: Migration, Ethnicity, Citizenship. Vienna: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W., Phinney, J. S., Sam, D. L., & Vedder, P. (2006). Immigrant youth: acculturation, identity, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55(3), 303–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crul, M., Schneider, J., & Lelie, F. (eds.) (2012). The European second generation compared. Does the integration context matter? Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, P. (2010). Contexts of immigrant receptivity and immigrant religious outcomes: the case of Muslims in Western Europe. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(3), 376–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, P., & Koenig, M. (2013). Bridges and barriers: religion and immigrant occupational attainment across integration contexts. International Migration Review, 47(1), 3–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagevos, J., Gijsberts, M., Kappelhof, J., & Vervoort, M. (2007). Survey Integratie Minderheden 2006. The Hague: SCP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dassetto, F. (1996). La construction de l’islam européen. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Koning, M. (2008). Zoeken naar een ‘Zuivere’ Islam. Religieuze Beleving en Identiteitsvorming van Marokkaans-Nederlandse Moslims. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Valk, H., & Liefbroer, A. (2007). Parental influence on union formation preferences among Turkish, Moroccan, and Dutch adolescents in the Netherlands. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(4), 487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doomernik, J. (1995). The institutionalization of Turkish Islam in Germany and the Netherlands: a comparison. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 18(1), 46–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebaugh, H. R., & Chafetz, J. S. (2000). Religion and the new immigrants. Continuities and adaptations in immigrant congregations. Walnut Creek (CA): AltaMira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eid, P. (2007). Being Arab: Ethnic and religious identity building among second generation youth in Montreal (Vol. 22). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. S., & Soper, J. C. (2005). Muslims and the state in Britain, France, and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, F., & Phalet, K. (2012). Integration and religiosity among the Turkish second generation in Europe: a comparative analysis across four capital cities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35(2), 320–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foblets, M.-C., & Overbeeke, A. (2002). State intervention in the institutionalisation of Islam in Belgium. In W. A. R. Shadid & S. Van Koningsveld (Eds.), Religious freedom and the neutrality of the state: The position of Islam in the European Union (pp. 113–128). Leuven: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foner, N., & Alba, R. (2008). Immigrant religion in the U.S. and Western Europe: Bridge or barrier to inclusion? International Migration Review, 42(2), 360–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H. J. (1994). Symbolic ethnicity and symbolic religiosity: towards a comparison of ethnic and religious acculturation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 17(4), 577–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groeneveld, S., & Weijers-Martens, Y. (2003). Minderheden in beeld: SPVA-02. Rotterdam: ISEO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güngör, D., Fleischmann, F., & Phalet, K. (2011). Religious identification, beliefs, and practices among Turkish Belgian and Moroccan Belgian Muslims: Intergenerational continuity and acculturative change. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(8), 1356–1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A., Rothon, C., & Kilpi, E. (2008). The Second Generation in Western Europe: Education, unemployment and occupational attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 211–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khosrokhavar, F. (1997). L’islam des jeunes. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P. E., Furrow, J. L., & Roth, N. H. (2002). The influence of family and peers on adolescent religiousness. The Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 21, 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, M. (2007). Europeanising the governance of religious diversity: An institutionalist account of Muslim struggles for public recognition. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(6), 911–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak, K. (2003). Adolescents and their parents: a review of intergenerational family relations for immigrant and non-immigrant families. Human Development, 46(2/3), 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M. (2000). The dignity of working men: Morality and the boundaries of race, class, and immigration. Harvard University Press.

  • Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1968). The politics of accommodation: pluralism and democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maliepaard, M., & Gijsberts, M. (2012) Moslim in Nederland 2012. The Hague: Netherlands Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maliepaard, M., Gijsberts, M. & Lubbers, M. (2012). Reaching the limits of secularization? Turkish- and Moroccan-Dutch Muslims in the Netherlands 1998–2006. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51(2), 359–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maliepaard, M. & Lubbers, M. (2013). Parental religious transmission after migration: The case of Dutch Muslims. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 39(3): 425–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maliepaard, M. & Phalet, K. (2012). Social integration and religious identity expression among Dutch Muslims: The role of minority and majority group contact. Social Psychology Quarterly, 75(2), 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, E. P. (1999). Minderheden in beeld: de SPVA-g8. Amsterdam: Veldkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinovic, B., & Verkuyten, M. (2012). Host national and religious identification among Turkish Muslims in Western Europe: The role of ingroup norms, perceived discrimination and value incompatibility. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(7), 893–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maussen, M. (2007). The governance of Islam in Western Europe: A state of the art report: IMISCOE.

  • Myers, S. M. (1996). An interactive model of religiosity inheritance: The importance of family context. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 858–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Forum (2011). The future of the global Muslim population. Projections for 2010–2030. Washington D.C.: Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phalet, K., Fleischmann, F., & Stojčić, S. (2012). Ways of ‘being Muslim’: Religious identities of second-generation Turks. In Crul, M., Schneider, J. & Lelie, F. (eds.), The European second generation compared: Does the integration context matter? Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phalet, K., & Güngör, D. (2009). Cultural continuity and discontinuity in Turkish migrant families. In S. Bekman & A. Koç (eds), Cross-cultural perspectives on human development and family change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phalet, K., & Heath, A. (2010). From Ethnic Boundaries to Ethnic Penalties: Urban Economies and the Turkish Second Generation. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(11), 1824–1850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raj, D. S. (2000). ‘Who the hell do you think you are?’: Promoting religious identity among young Hindus in Britain. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25(3), 535–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rath, J., Penninx, R., Groenendijk, K., & Meijer, A. (1996). Nederland en zijn islam. Een ontzuilende samenleving reageert op het ontstaan van een geloofsgemeenschap Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regnerus, M. D., Smith, C., & Smith, B. (2004). Social context in the development of adolescent religiosity. Applied Developmental Science, 8(1), 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffauer, W. (2000). Die Gottesmänner. Frankfurt a/M: Suhrkampf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G. (2011). Understanding and approaching Muslim visibilities: Lessons from a fieldwork-based study of Muslims in Copenhagen. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(7), 1216–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sniderman, P. M., & Hagendoorn, L. (2007). When ways of life collide. Multiculturalism and its discontents in the Netherlands. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statham, P., Koopmans, R., Giugni, M., & Passy, F. (2005). Resilient or adaptable Islam? Multiculturalism, religion and migrants’ claims-making for group demands in Britain, the Netherlands and France. Ethnicities, 5(4), 427–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, M., Phalet, K., Baysu, G., Vandezande, V., & Fleischmann, F. (2008). Technical Report TIES 2007–2008 Belgium — Extended. Trajectories and Experiences of Turkish, Moroccan and Native Belgians in Antwerp and Brussels. Leuven: CeSo/CSCP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tubergen, F., & Sindradóttir, J. Í. (2011). The Religiosity of Immigrants in Europe: A Cross-National Study. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50(2), 272–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voas, D. & Fleischmann, F. (2012). Islam moves West: Religious change in the first and second generation. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 525–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werbner, P. (2000). Divided loyalties, empowered citizenship? Muslims in Britain. Citizenship Studies, 4(3), 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A. (2008). Elementary strategies of ethnic boundary making. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(6), 1025–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ysseldyk, R., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2010). Religiosity as identity: toward an understanding of religion from a social identity perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 60–71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Phalet.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phalet, K., Maliepaard, M., Fleischmann, F. et al. The Making and Unmaking of Religious Boundaries. CMS 1, 123–145 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5117/CMS2013.1.PHAL

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.5117/CMS2013.1.PHAL

Keywords

  • boundary making
  • religion
  • Islam
  • Europe
  • second generation
  • cultural maintenance