Skip to main content

When Extremes Converge

German and Canadian Labor Migration Policy Compared

Abstract

Not only but particularly in terms of labor migration policy Germany and Canada are widely perceived as being situated at opposite ends of the spectrum. Whereas Canada has for a long time been enjoying a reputation of being one or even the role model for countries seeking to develop a flexible and welcoming immigration scheme that is nonetheless responsive to shortages and demands of specific sectors of the national labor market, the German system has been suffering from the suspicion of being not only structurally hostile towards immigrants but also of featuring a structural one-sidedness in terms of its steering, control and recruitment instruments. Against the background of major immigration reforms in the segment of highly skilled labor migration in both countries the paper describes and analyzes the core elements of these recent policy reforms, arguing that Canada and Germany as of 2013 increasingly display more similarities than differences in their high-skilled labor immigration policy. Both countries have departed from extreme and one-sided steering approaches and now run ‘hybrid systems’ that aim at making use of the advantages of different steering and recruitment approaches.

References

  1. Berlin-Institut für Bevölkerung und Entwicklung (2012). Nach Punkten vorn. Was Deutschland von der Zuwanderungs- und Integrationspolitik Kanadas lernen kann. Berlin.

  2. Boeri T., Brücker H., Docquier F. & Rapoport H. (2012). Brain Drain and Brain Gain. The Global Competition to Attract High-Skilled Migrants. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Bommes M. (2006). Integration durch Sprache als politisches Konzept. In U. Davy & A. Weber (Eds.), Paradigmenwechsel in Einwanderungsfragen? Überlegungen zum neuen Zuwanderungsgesetz (pp. 59–86). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chaloff J. & Lemaître G. (2009). Managing Highly-Skilled Labour Migration: A Comparative Analysis of Migration Policies and Challenges in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 79.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Citizenship and Immigration Canada (2010). Evaluation of the Federal Skilled Worker Program. Ottawa.

  6. Cohen, Y., Haberfeld, Y. & Kogan, I. (2008). Jüdische Migranten aus der ehemaligen Sowjetunion. Ein natürliches Experiment zur Migrationsentscheidung. In F. Kalter (Ed.), Migration und Integration (Sonderheft der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie) (pp. 185–201). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  7. DiMaggio, P.J. & Powell W.W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Drezner, D.W. (2001). Globalization and Policy Convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 53–78.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ette, A. (2003). Germany’s Immigration Policy, 2000–2002. Understanding Policy Change with a Politcal Process Approach. Bremen: Center on Migration, Citizenship and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Finotelli, C. (2012). Change of Paradigms? A Comparison of Canadian and Spanish Labour Migration Models. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 15, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hailbronner, K. & Koslowski, R. (2008). Models for Immigration Management Schemes: Comparison and Analysis of Existing Approaches and a Perspective for Future Reforms. Washington DC: Immigration Paper Series.

  12. Hall, P.A. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25, 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Holzinger, K. & Knill, C. (2007). Ursachen und Bedingungen internationaler Politikkonvergenz. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 38, 85–106.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jacoby T. (2010). Selecting For Integration — What Role For A Point System?. Washington DC: Policy Brief for the German Marshall Fund of the United States.

  15. Jurgens J. (2010). The legacies of labor recruitment: The guest worker and green card programs in the Federal Republic of Germany. Policy and Society, 29, 345–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Katzenstein P. (1987). Policy and Politics in West Germany: The Growth of a Semisovereign State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Koopmans R., Michalowski, I. & Waibel S. (2012). Citizenship Rights for Immigrants in Western Europe. American Journal for Sociology, 117, 1202–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Langenfeld C. & Waibel S. (2013). Von der Begrenzung zur Steuerung: Deutschlands Abkehr vom „widerstrebenden“ Einwanderungsland. In W. Fritzemeyer, G. Jochum & M. Kau (Eds.), Grenzüberschreitendes Recht — Crossing Frontiers. Festschriftfür Kay Hailbronner (pp. 169–184). Heidelberg: C.F. Müller.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martin P.L. (1994). Germany-Reluctant Land of Immigration. In W.A. Cornelius, P.L. Martin & J.F. Hollifield (Eds.), Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective (pp. 189–225). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. O’Shea E. (2009). Missing the Point(s). The declining fortunes of Canada’s economic immigration program. Washington DC: Transatlantic Academy Paper Series.

  21. OECD (2013). Recruiting Immigrant Workers: Germany. Paris.

  22. Papademetriou D.G. & O’Neill K. (2004). Efficient Practices for the Selection of Economic Migrants. Hamburg: HWWA Working Paper.

  23. Papademetriou D.G. & Sumption M. (2011). Rethinking Point Systems and Employer-Selected Immigration. Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Picot G. & Sweetman A. (2012). Making It in Canada: Immigration Outcomes and Policies. Montreal: IRPP Study.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Reitz J. (2013). Closing the Gaps Between Skilled Immigration and Canadian Labor Markets: Emerging Policy Issues and Priorities. In T. Triadafilopoulos (Ed.), Wanted and Welcome? Policies for Highly Skilled Immigrants in Comparative Perspective (pp. 147–163). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rüb F. (2012). Rapide Politikwechsel in der Demokratie: Gründe, Akteure, Dynamiken und Probleme. In J. Kersten & G.F. Schuppert (Eds.), Politikwechsel als Governanceproblem (pp. 15–44). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rüb F. (2014). Rapide Politikwechsel in der Bundesrepublik: Mögliche Gründe, Akteure, Dynamiken und Probleme. Zeitschriftfür Politik (forthcoming).

  28. Sabatier P.A. & Jenkins-Smith H.C. (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sachverständigenrat für Zuwanderung und Integration (2004). Migration und Integration — Erfahrungen nutzen, Neues wagen. Berlin.

  30. Schönwälder K. (2013). Germany: Reluctant Steps Towards a System of Selective Immigration. In T. Triadafilopoulos (Ed.), Wanted and Welcome? Policies for Highly Skilled Immigrants in Comparative Perspective (pp. 273–286). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shachar A. (2006). The Race for Talent: Highly Skilled Migrants and Competitive Immigration Regimes. New York University Law Review, 81, 148–206.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shachar A. (2013). Talent Matters: Immigration Policy Setting as a Competitive Cramble Among Jurisdictions. In T. Triadafilopoulos (Ed.), Wanted and Welcome? Policies for Highly Skilled Immigrants in Comparative Perspective (pp. 85–104). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Steller B. (2013). Deutschland auf dem Weg zu einem Willkommensrecht? Zur Umsetzung der EU-Hochqualifiziertenrichtlinie in deutsches Recht zum 1.8.2012. Zeitschriftfür Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik, 33, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Strunden M. & Schubert M. (2012). Deutschland gibt sich „Blue Card Plus“ — EU-Richtlinie genutzt für Meilenstein der Arbeitsmigration. Zeitschriftfür Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik, 32, 270–275.

    Google Scholar 

  35. SVR (2011). Migrationsland 2011. Berlin.

  36. SVR (2012). Erfolgsfall Europa? Folgen und Herausforderungen der EU-Freizügigkeit für Deutschland. Berlin.

  37. Thränhardt D. (1995). Germany — An Undeclared Immigration Country. New Community, 21, 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thym D. (2012). Stellungnahme für die Öffentliche Anhörung des Innenausschusses des Deutschen Bundestags am Montag, den 23. April 2012 zum Gesetzentwurf der Bundesregierung zur Umsetzung der Hochqualifizierten-Richtlinie der Europäischen Union (BT-Drs. 17/8682 v. 15. 02. 2012). Berlin.

  39. Triadafilopoulos, T. & Schönwälder K. (2006). How the Federal Republic Became an Immigration Country. Norms, Politics and the Failure of West Germany’s Guest Worker System. German Politics and Society, 24, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Worswick, C. (2013). Economic Implications of Recent Changes to the Temporary Foreign Worker Program. Montreal: IRPP Insight.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holger Kolb.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kolb, H. When Extremes Converge. CMS 2, 57–75 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5117/CMS2014.1.KOLB

Download citation

Keywords

  • Immigration Policy
  • Canada
  • Germany
  • Point Systems