Skip to main content

Advertisement

When Extremes Converge

Article metrics

Abstract

Not only but particularly in terms of labor migration policy Germany and Canada are widely perceived as being situated at opposite ends of the spectrum. Whereas Canada has for a long time been enjoying a reputation of being one or even the role model for countries seeking to develop a flexible and welcoming immigration scheme that is nonetheless responsive to shortages and demands of specific sectors of the national labor market, the German system has been suffering from the suspicion of being not only structurally hostile towards immigrants but also of featuring a structural one-sidedness in terms of its steering, control and recruitment instruments. Against the background of major immigration reforms in the segment of highly skilled labor migration in both countries the paper describes and analyzes the core elements of these recent policy reforms, arguing that Canada and Germany as of 2013 increasingly display more similarities than differences in their high-skilled labor immigration policy. Both countries have departed from extreme and one-sided steering approaches and now run ‘hybrid systems’ that aim at making use of the advantages of different steering and recruitment approaches.

References

  1. Berlin-Institut für Bevölkerung und Entwicklung (2012). Nach Punkten vorn. Was Deutschland von der Zuwanderungs- und Integrationspolitik Kanadas lernen kann. Berlin.

  2. Boeri T., Brücker H., Docquier F. & Rapoport H. (2012). Brain Drain and Brain Gain. The Global Competition to Attract High-Skilled Migrants. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  3. Bommes M. (2006). Integration durch Sprache als politisches Konzept. In U. Davy & A. Weber (Eds.), Paradigmenwechsel in Einwanderungsfragen? Überlegungen zum neuen Zuwanderungsgesetz (pp. 59–86). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

  4. Chaloff J. & Lemaître G. (2009). Managing Highly-Skilled Labour Migration: A Comparative Analysis of Migration Policies and Challenges in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 79.

  5. Citizenship and Immigration Canada (2010). Evaluation of the Federal Skilled Worker Program. Ottawa.

  6. Cohen, Y., Haberfeld, Y. & Kogan, I. (2008). Jüdische Migranten aus der ehemaligen Sowjetunion. Ein natürliches Experiment zur Migrationsentscheidung. In F. Kalter (Ed.), Migration und Integration (Sonderheft der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie) (pp. 185–201). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

  7. DiMaggio, P.J. & Powell W.W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

  8. Drezner, D.W. (2001). Globalization and Policy Convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 53–78.

  9. Ette, A. (2003). Germany’s Immigration Policy, 2000–2002. Understanding Policy Change with a Politcal Process Approach. Bremen: Center on Migration, Citizenship and Development.

  10. Finotelli, C. (2012). Change of Paradigms? A Comparison of Canadian and Spanish Labour Migration Models. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 15, 1–18.

  11. Hailbronner, K. & Koslowski, R. (2008). Models for Immigration Management Schemes: Comparison and Analysis of Existing Approaches and a Perspective for Future Reforms. Washington DC: Immigration Paper Series.

  12. Hall, P.A. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25, 275–296.

  13. Holzinger, K. & Knill, C. (2007). Ursachen und Bedingungen internationaler Politikkonvergenz. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 38, 85–106.

  14. Jacoby T. (2010). Selecting For Integration — What Role For A Point System?. Washington DC: Policy Brief for the German Marshall Fund of the United States.

  15. Jurgens J. (2010). The legacies of labor recruitment: The guest worker and green card programs in the Federal Republic of Germany. Policy and Society, 29, 345–355.

  16. Katzenstein P. (1987). Policy and Politics in West Germany: The Growth of a Semisovereign State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

  17. Koopmans R., Michalowski, I. & Waibel S. (2012). Citizenship Rights for Immigrants in Western Europe. American Journal for Sociology, 117, 1202–1245.

  18. Langenfeld C. & Waibel S. (2013). Von der Begrenzung zur Steuerung: Deutschlands Abkehr vom „widerstrebenden“ Einwanderungsland. In W. Fritzemeyer, G. Jochum & M. Kau (Eds.), Grenzüberschreitendes Recht — Crossing Frontiers. Festschriftfür Kay Hailbronner (pp. 169–184). Heidelberg: C.F. Müller.

  19. Martin P.L. (1994). Germany-Reluctant Land of Immigration. In W.A. Cornelius, P.L. Martin & J.F. Hollifield (Eds.), Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective (pp. 189–225). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  20. O’Shea E. (2009). Missing the Point(s). The declining fortunes of Canada’s economic immigration program. Washington DC: Transatlantic Academy Paper Series.

  21. OECD (2013). Recruiting Immigrant Workers: Germany. Paris.

  22. Papademetriou D.G. & O’Neill K. (2004). Efficient Practices for the Selection of Economic Migrants. Hamburg: HWWA Working Paper.

  23. Papademetriou D.G. & Sumption M. (2011). Rethinking Point Systems and Employer-Selected Immigration. Washington DC: Migration Policy Institute.

  24. Picot G. & Sweetman A. (2012). Making It in Canada: Immigration Outcomes and Policies. Montreal: IRPP Study.

  25. Reitz J. (2013). Closing the Gaps Between Skilled Immigration and Canadian Labor Markets: Emerging Policy Issues and Priorities. In T. Triadafilopoulos (Ed.), Wanted and Welcome? Policies for Highly Skilled Immigrants in Comparative Perspective (pp. 147–163). New York: Springer.

  26. Rüb F. (2012). Rapide Politikwechsel in der Demokratie: Gründe, Akteure, Dynamiken und Probleme. In J. Kersten & G.F. Schuppert (Eds.), Politikwechsel als Governanceproblem (pp. 15–44). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

  27. Rüb F. (2014). Rapide Politikwechsel in der Bundesrepublik: Mögliche Gründe, Akteure, Dynamiken und Probleme. Zeitschriftfür Politik (forthcoming).

  28. Sabatier P.A. & Jenkins-Smith H.C. (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview.

  29. Sachverständigenrat für Zuwanderung und Integration (2004). Migration und Integration — Erfahrungen nutzen, Neues wagen. Berlin.

  30. Schönwälder K. (2013). Germany: Reluctant Steps Towards a System of Selective Immigration. In T. Triadafilopoulos (Ed.), Wanted and Welcome? Policies for Highly Skilled Immigrants in Comparative Perspective (pp. 273–286). New York: Springer.

  31. Shachar A. (2006). The Race for Talent: Highly Skilled Migrants and Competitive Immigration Regimes. New York University Law Review, 81, 148–206.

  32. Shachar A. (2013). Talent Matters: Immigration Policy Setting as a Competitive Cramble Among Jurisdictions. In T. Triadafilopoulos (Ed.), Wanted and Welcome? Policies for Highly Skilled Immigrants in Comparative Perspective (pp. 85–104). New York: Springer.

  33. Steller B. (2013). Deutschland auf dem Weg zu einem Willkommensrecht? Zur Umsetzung der EU-Hochqualifiziertenrichtlinie in deutsches Recht zum 1.8.2012. Zeitschriftfür Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik, 33, 1–11.

  34. Strunden M. & Schubert M. (2012). Deutschland gibt sich „Blue Card Plus“ — EU-Richtlinie genutzt für Meilenstein der Arbeitsmigration. Zeitschriftfür Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik, 32, 270–275.

  35. SVR (2011). Migrationsland 2011. Berlin.

  36. SVR (2012). Erfolgsfall Europa? Folgen und Herausforderungen der EU-Freizügigkeit für Deutschland. Berlin.

  37. Thränhardt D. (1995). Germany — An Undeclared Immigration Country. New Community, 21, 19–35.

  38. Thym D. (2012). Stellungnahme für die Öffentliche Anhörung des Innenausschusses des Deutschen Bundestags am Montag, den 23. April 2012 zum Gesetzentwurf der Bundesregierung zur Umsetzung der Hochqualifizierten-Richtlinie der Europäischen Union (BT-Drs. 17/8682 v. 15. 02. 2012). Berlin.

  39. Triadafilopoulos, T. & Schönwälder K. (2006). How the Federal Republic Became an Immigration Country. Norms, Politics and the Failure of West Germany’s Guest Worker System. German Politics and Society, 24, 1–19.

  40. Worswick, C. (2013). Economic Implications of Recent Changes to the Temporary Foreign Worker Program. Montreal: IRPP Insight.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Holger Kolb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • Immigration Policy
  • Canada
  • Germany
  • Point Systems