Skip to main content

Advertisement

Understanding Different Post-Return Experiences

Article metrics

Abstract

Studies aimed at understanding different post-return experiences point at various factors that are involved. In this article, we show the importance of striving for a contextualized understanding of post-return experiences as different factors appear to be important in different cases. Our study sets out to seek the value of the theory of preparedness proposed by Cassarino and simultaneously contribute to further contextualization of this theory through a qualitative study conducted in Morocco. Drawing on 44 qualitative interviews with a diverse set of returned migrants we scrutinize how mechanisms related to intersections between factors commonly found to be important in the literature take shape to make different factors important in different cases. For example, we show how the ability to keep transnational contacts with the destination country after return adds to positive post-return experiences, but only for migrants with specific return motives. In doing so, this article contributes to theory specification and contextualization.

References

  1. Al-Ali, N., Black, R. & Koser, K. (2001) The limits of transnationalism: Bosnian and Eritrean refugees in Europe as emerging transnational communities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(4): 578–600. DOI:10.1080/01419870120049798

  2. Bastia, T. (2011) Should I stay or should I go? Return migration in times of crises. Journal of International Development, 23(4): 583–595. DOI:10.1002/jid.1794

  3. Bath, W. & Roberts, B.R. (2012) ‘Forbidden return’: return migration in the age of restriction. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 10(2): 162–183. DOI:10.1080/15562948.2012.674325

  4. Bloch, A. (2008) Zimbabweans in Britain: transnational activities and capabilities. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(2): 287–305. DOI:10.1080/13691830701823822

  5. Carling, J. (2004) Emigration, return and development in Cape Verde: the impact of closing borders. Population, Space and Place, 10(2): 113–132. DOI:10.1002/psp.322

  6. Cassarino, J.P. (2004) Theorising return migration: the conceptual approach to return migrants revisited. International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 6(2): 253–279.

  7. Cassarino, J.P. (2008) Conditions of modern return migrants — Editorial introduction. International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 10(2): 95–105.

  8. Cerase, F.P. (1974) Expectations and reality: a case study of return migration from the Unites States to southern Italy. International Migration Review, 8(2): 245–262. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3002783 (geen DOI, wel “stable link”)

  9. Constant, A. & Massey, D. (2002) Return migration by German guestworkers: Neoclassical versus new economic theories. International Migration, 40(4): 5–38. DOI:10.1111/1468-2435.00204

  10. De Bree, J., Davids, T. & De Haas, H. (2010) Post-return experiences and transnational belonging of returned migrants: a Dutch-Moroccan case study. Global Networks, 10(4): 489–509. DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2010.00299.x

  11. Gmelch, G. (1980) Return migration. Annual review of Anthropology, 9: 135–159. DOI:10.1146/annurev.an.09.100180.001031

  12. Fokkema, T. (2011) ‘Return’ migration intentions among second-generation Turks in Europe: the effect of integration and transnationalism in a cross-national perspective. Journal of Mediterranean Studies, 20(2): 365–388.

  13. Hunter, A. (2010) Theory and practice of return migration at retirement: the case of migrant worker hostel residents in France. Population Space and Place, 17(2): 179–192. DOI:10.1002/psp.610

  14. Itzigsohn, J. & S.G. Saucedo (2002) Immigrant incorporation and sociocultural transnationalism. International Migration Review, 766–798. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4149563 (Article first published online: 23 FEB 2006 DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2002.tb00104.x.)

  15. Jansen, S. (2011). Refuchess: locating Bosniac repatriates after the war in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Population, Space and Place, 17(2): 140–152. DOI:10.1002/psp.607

  16. Jeffery, L. & Murison, J. (2011) Guest editorial: the temporal, social, spatial and legal dimensions of return and onward migration. Population, Space and Place, 17(2): 131–139. DOI:10.1002/psp.606

  17. Komter, A. (1996) Reciprocity as a principle of exclusion: Gift giving in the Netherlands. Sociology, 30(2): 299–316. DOI:10.1177/0038038596030002006

  18. Ley, D. & Kobayashi, A. (2005) Back to Hong Kong: return migration or transnational sojourn? Global Networks, 5(2): 111–127. DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2005.00110.x

  19. Massey, D. S., Alarcón, R., Durand, J., & González, H. (1987) Return to Aztlan. The social process of international migration from western Mexico. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

  20. Portes, A. (2001) Introduction: the debates and significance of immigrant transnationalism. Global Networks, 1(3): 181–93. DOI:10.1111/1471-0374.00012

  21. Reynolds, T. (2010) Transnational family relationships, social networks and return migration among British-Caribbean young people. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(5): 797–815. DOI:10.1080/01419870903307931

  22. Sinatti, G. (2011) Mobile transmigrants or unsettled returnees? Myth of return and permanent resettlement among Senegalese migrants. Population, Space and Place, 17(2): 153–166. DOI:10.1002/psp.608

  23. Snel, E., G. Engbersen & A. Leerkes (2006) Transnational involvement and social Integration. Global Networks, 6(3): 285–308. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00145.x

  24. Van Houte, M. & Davids, T. (2008) Development and return migration: from policy panacea to migrant perspective sustainability. Third World Quarterly, 29(7): 1411–1429. DOI: 10.1080/01436590802386658

  25. Van Meeteren, M. (2012) Transnational activities and aspirations of irregular migrants in Belgium and the Netherlands. Global Networks, 12(3): 314–332. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2012.00354.x

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Marije Faber MA.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • return migration
  • Morocco
  • transnationalism
  • return motivations
  • preparedness
  • transnational obligations
  • post-return experiences
  • immigration
  • family expectations
  • the Netherlands