Skip to main content

Government Responses to Foreign Worker Demand During Economic Crises

The Cases of Britain and France 2008–2013

Abstract

With the aim of developing existing theories of labour immigration policy, I focus on the question of persisting demand for foreign workers during economic downturns and how governments attempt to respond to this. The argument is that, apart from turning a blind eye to irregular labour migration, there are two ways in which governments respond to demand for migrant labour during economic hard times. First, despite a rhetorical emphasis on restricting labour immigration, they continue to facilitate the entry of highly skilled labour migrants and the employment of migrants who enter a country with a non-economic motive. Second, they encourage resident workers to take up jobs in occupations where migrant workers are concentrated. This hypothesis is borne out in my exploration of French and British government responses to foreign labour demand between 2008 and 2013.

References

  • Bertossi, C. (2008). ‘France: the State strives to shape “chosen” immigration’, Politiche Migratorie e Modelli di Società (Rome: CeSPI).

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS (2009). ‘Skills for growth: National skills strategy’, (London: BIS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, S. (2013). ‘Non-European Labour Migration to the UK’, (Oxford: Migration Observatory Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, G. (2008). ‘The Political Economy of Activation: Explaining Cross-National Variation in Active Labour Market Policy’, Working Paper De l’IDHEAP, (1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boswell, C. (2008). ‘UK Labour Migration Policy: Permanent Revolution?’, (Rome: CeSPI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boswell, C. (2009). The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. (2013). ‘David Cameron’s Immigration speech’, in University Campus Suffolk (ed.), (Ipswich).

  • CAS (2006). ‘Besoins de main-d’œuvre et politique migratoire’, (Paris: Centre d’analyse stratégique). [‘Labour shortages and migration policy’, Paris: Centre for Strategic Analysis]

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S. (2004). ‘Why migration policies fail’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27(2), 205–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clasen, J. & Clegg, D. (2003). ‘Unemployment Protection and Labour Market Reform in France and Great Britain in the 1990s: Solidarity Versus Activation?’, Journal of Social Policy, 32(3), 361–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, W. Martin, P. & Hollifield, J. F. (eds.) (1994). Controlling Immigration. A Global Perspective (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (2005). ‘Skill formation systems’, in S. Ackroyd, et al. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Work and Organization (Oxford: OUP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, C. (2010). ‘The Migrant Worker Factor in labour market policy reform’, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 16(3), 259–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, G. (1995). ‘Modes of Immigration Policies in Liberal Democratic States’, International Migration Review, 29(4), 881–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiraudon, V. & Joppke, C. (eds.) (2001). Controlling a new migration world (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollifield, J. F. (2004). ‘Migration and International Relations: the Liberal Paradox’, in Entzinger, H. et al., (ed.), Migration between States and Markets (Aldershot: Ashgate).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (2002). ‘Secure borders, safe havens: Integration with diversity in modern Britain’, in Home Office (ed.), (London).

  • Joppke, C. (1998). ‘Why Liberal States Accept Unwanted Immigration’, World Politics 50(2), 266–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D. (1995). Actively Seeking Work? The Politics of Unemployment and Welfare Policy in the United States and Great Britain (Chicago: The University of Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krings, T. (2009). ‘A race to the bottom?’ Trade unions, EU enlargement and the free movement of labour’, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 15 (1).

  • Le nouvel observateur (2013). ‘La France “n’a pas besoin de maçons et de serveurs” immigrés 22 May 2013’.

  • Lochak, D. (2006). ‘La loi du 24 juillet 2006 relative à l’immigration et à l’intégration 45–55’, La française Regards sur l’actualité, 326, 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAC (2009). ‘Analysis of the Points Based System Tier 2 and Dependants’, (Croydon: Migration Advisory Committee).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. & Ruhs, M. (2010). ‘Labor Shortages and US Immigration Reform: Promises and Perils of an Independent Commission’, COMPAS WP, No. 81.

  • Menz, G. (2005). Varieties of Capitalism and Europeanisation: National Responses to the Single Market. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Migration Observatory (2011). ‘A loose fitting cap: why is the limit on skilled non-EU workers undersubscribed?’, (Oxford: University of Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministère de l’Intérieur (2013). ‘Les données de l’immigration professionnelle et étudiante Document préparatoire au débat au Parlement’, (Paris).

  • Ministère de l’Intérieur, de l’outre-mer, des collectivités territoriales et de l’immigration et Ministère du travail, de l’emploi et de la santé. (2011). ‘Maitrise de l’immigration professionelle’, (Paris).

  • Ministère de l’Intérieur, de l’outre-mer, des collectivités territoriales et de l’immigration, Ministère du travail, de l’emploi et de la santé et Ministère de l’Enseignment Supérieur et de la Recherche. (2012). ‘Circulaire du 12 janvier relative à l’accès au marché du travail des diplômés étrangers de niveau au moins équivalent au Master: modalités d’examen des demandes’, (Paris).

  • OECD (2009). ‘International Migration Outlook’, Sopemi edition (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhs, M. & Martin, P. (2008). ‘Numbers vs Rights: Trade-offs and Guestworker Programs’, International Migration Review, 42(1), 249–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schain, M. (2006). ‘The Extreme Right and Immigration Policy-Making: Measuring Direct and Indirect Effects’, West European Politics, 29(2), 270–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, W. (2007). Immigration Under New Labour (Bristol: The Policy Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, A. (2011). ‘Businesses reject call from Iain Duncan Smith to employ more Britons’, The Guardian.

  • Stephens, P. (2013). ‘Britain ‘Open for Business, Closed to Foreigners’ (20th of February 2013)’, Financial Times.

  • Summers, D. (2009). ‘Brown stands by British jobs for British workers remark’, The Guardian, 30th of January 2009.

  • The Economist. (2012). ‘Marine Le Pen Waiting in the shadows (11th April 2012)’.

  • Transatlantic Trends. (2012). ‘Transatlantic Trends: Immigration 2011’, (German Marshall Fund of United States).

  • UKBA (2010). ‘The Student Immigration System: a consultation’, (Croydon: UKBA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, P. (2006). ‘Lettre de Patrick Weil à Nicolas Sarkory sur la réforme, 24 février 2006’, (Paris). [‘Letter from Patrick Weil to Nicolas Sarkozy concerning the 24th of February 2006 reform’]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camilla Devitt PhD in political and social sciences.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Devitt, C. Government Responses to Foreign Worker Demand During Economic Crises. CMS 2, 445–467 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5117/CMS2014.4.DEVI

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.5117/CMS2014.4.DEVI

Keywords

  • labour immigration
  • labour supply
  • policy
  • Britain
  • France
  • economic downturn